The trophy case · The shipping record

Proof of work.

Everything the Studio's operator has shipped: products in production, open-source tools you can clone tonight, and the lab experiments behind them. “You can just build things” is a claim. This page is the evidence.

35projects
21open repos
5products
3GitHub orgs
Products

Software with users on the other end.

live · Next.js · Postgres · Qdrant

Struvo

Voice-to-field-report platform for construction teams: talk through a site visit, get back a structured, photo-linked report.

in production · Next.js · Drizzle · Neon

TwentyFive

Campaign and financial CRM built for a working creative agency: pipelines, scheduling, lead scoring, real books.

2026
in production · TypeScript

Bree'ze Squeeze platform

Operations platform for a family-run juice business: orders, batches, markets.

2026
Always one more

The next product usually starts as a Saturday demo.

See the lab ↓
Open source

Clone it, run it, break it, tell us.

These 21 repositories contain code and instructions. Many are parts of the Studio's AI setup. Some compare answers from several models; others check code changes, provide reference material or help run everyday tasks. The tools and checks used around an AI agent are often called its harness. The Studio's setup is documented as entry 001 on the Harness Ledger.

Published as-is, from real work. To clone a repository is to copy its code to your computer; check its setup instructions and license before using it. If one saves you an afternoon, come say so at a Sharathon.

Start here
Lucface · TypeScriptSnapshot · 2026-07-09

blind-council

Five frontier models debate blind; a sixth judges, corrects, and settles. A multi-model council with a dedicated judge seat.

GitHub →pushed 4 days ago
SanDiegoAIStudio · PythonSnapshot · 2026-06-17

apollo-mission-control

Multi-agent simulation of Apollo-era Mission Control: every flight-controller seat is an AI agent, together flying a KSP Apollo 11 mission.

GitHub →★1 · pushed 4 days ago
SanDiegoAIStudioSnapshot · 2026-05-11

sharathon-01

Set up for the studio's first Sharathon so each attendee could add one file. It holds a README, a license and an empty attendees folder.

GitHub →★1 · pushed May 2026
Just published

Straight off the workbench.

New public repos land here the hour they go up, before anyone gets around to writing them a proper description.

  • Banger Recall: a 45-second voice check-in that proves a business song's message landed (Slopathon build)

    Lucface · pushed today
  • One door a day for 100 days into the things I've made with AI

    Lucface · pushed today
The lab

Experiments that earned a name.

  • QR Rescue

    Forensic pipeline that decoded an unscannable, out-of-focus conference QR: grid fitting, calibration from the code's own structure, Reed-Solomon. Full crack story linked. See it →

    2026
  • AI Vid Vibe

    AI-video creator community hub, 200+ members, now graduating into a weekly studio program.

    2025
  • VideoMind

    Personal YouTube watch history, transcribed, embedded, and searchable: ask your own viewing history questions.

    2025
The Harness Ledger · Not a leaderboard

How builders here shape their AI systems, graded the same way.

A result is a dated profile of what a setup can demonstrably do, with evidence for each score, the gaps, and what is deliberately out of scope.

Everyone here is building an AI system: memory, autonomy, retrieval, agents, security, the rails that connect it to real work. Nobody's is shaped like anyone else's. This is the record of those shapes, graded on twelve dimensions, receipts first. The differences are the point.

Method v1, frozen 2026-07-22. v2 draft open for input.Updated 2026-09-30No entries waiting for review

Twelve dimensions. Every harness, the same grid.

Show all twelve ↓
  1. D1Ingress + voice

    Channels a human can reach it through; live voice loop.

  2. D2Autonomy + scheduling

    Useful work with nobody in the chair, and dead work gets loud.

  3. D3Memory + provenance

    Can it prove where a fact came from; does history survive updates.

  4. D4Retrieval, measured

    Hybrid search quality, and whether anyone actually benchmarked it.

  5. D5Skill library

    Packaged capability, kept trustworthy with linting and install gates.

  6. D6Self-improvement

    Does it get better on its own, and is that safe.

  7. D7Evals + dispatch

    Is 'the right capability fired and the output was good' measured or vibes.

  8. D8Multi-agent

    Fan-out, pipelines, cross-model adjudication, quarantine tiers.

  9. D9Security

    Injection defense, blast-radius control, secrets, supply chain.

  10. D10Compute sovereignty

    Local models, own hardware, no single vendor able to switch it off.

  11. D11Business integration

    Finance, CRM, legal, client delivery, approval-gated publishing.

  12. D12Ecosystem + momentum

    Who else improves it while the operator sleeps.

The record

3 harnesses on the board.

#003

orionarchitekton

0/12 leadsavg 6.1Method v1 · T02026-09-26

Orion estate harness

6
D1
8
D2
7
D3
4
D4
8
D5
6
D6
4
D7
8
D8
6
D9
7
D10
6
D11
3
D12

One-person operator harness across four owned nodes: wide and heavily gated, thin on measurement, with most scheduled loops paused by a dated decision.

Scored 73 of 120. The dossier is private; full receipts stay on the builder's machine, open read-only to the other builder for cross-grading in the merge window.

How it's graded

Receipts before scores. Measured beats claimed.

Run the paste-in prompt against your machine, get a dossier of your own, and post the scorecard. It lands on this board next to everyone else's. Bring it to a Sharathon and we'll read the shapes together.

The grading rules and what to expect ↓
  1. 01

    Receipts before scores. Inventory the system by looking, not by asking.

  2. 02

    Measured beats claimed. A benchmark number outranks an architecture that should work.

  3. 03

    N/A is never zero. Out-of-scope-by-design is graded N/A and left out of the lead count.

  4. 04

    No flattery. Every trailing dimension is either a deliberate choice or a real gap with the smallest artifact that would close it.

  5. 05

    Zero-regression honesty. Re-grades never quietly lower a number.

Before you post

What to expect

  • ·

    Voluntary open-source participation. The prompt and method are MIT-licensed.

  • ·

    An accepted entry appears on the ledger under the name or handle you chose.

  • ·

    Lucas Cooper-Bey reviews every entry within 7 days.

  • ·

    Cross-grading with another builder is optional.

  • ·

    Posting creates no role, no pay and no obligation.

Some of these started as a Sharathon demo.

Bring what you're building, or the idea you haven't started. Share progress and see what other people are making. Recordings are shared when available and cleared for sharing.

Get Studio updates.

Join the waitlist for the next Sharathon and hear when other Studio meetups open. Free. Email only. Unsubscribe any time.